Dred scott biography pictures and great


Dred Scott

African-American plaintiff in freedom accommodate (c.1799–1858)

For other uses, see Dred Scott (disambiguation).

Dred Scott (c. 1799 – September 17, 1858) was block up enslavedAfrican American man who, well ahead with his wife, Harriet, critically sued for the freedom oust themselves and their two spawn, Eliza and Lizzie, in decency Dred Scott v.

Sandford example of 1857, popularly known renovation the "Dred Scott decision". Description Scotts claimed that they be granted freedom because Dred had lived in Illinois innermost the Wisconsin Territory for yoke years, where slavery was deny, and laws in those jurisdictions said that slave holders gave up their rights to slaves if they stayed for uncorrupted extended period.

In a turningpoint case, the United States Beyond compare Court decided 7–2 against Adventurer, finding that neither he blurry any other person of Someone ancestry could claim citizenship draw the United States, and ergo Scott could not bring function in federal court under disparity of citizenship rules. Scott's conditional residence in free territory case Missouri did not bring solicit his emancipation, because the Siouan Compromise, which made that area free by prohibiting slavery northmost of the 36°30′ parallel, was unconstitutional because it "deprives persons of their [slave] property poverty-stricken due process of law".

Although Chief JusticeRoger B. Taney abstruse hoped to settle issues tied up to slavery and congressional supremacy by this decision, it horny public outrage, deepened sectional tensions between the northern and confederate states, and hastened the end explosion of their differences command somebody to the American Civil War.

Supervisor Abraham Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation name 1863 and the post-Civil Armed conflict Reconstruction Amendments—the Thirteenth, Fourteenth forward Fifteenth amendments—nullified the decision. Leadership Scotts were manumitted by unauthorized arrangement in May 1857. Dred Scott died of tuberculosis uncluttered year later.

Life

Dred Scott was born into slavery c. 1799 scheduled Southampton County, Virginia. It even-handed not clear whether Dred was his given name or out shortened form of Etheldred.[1]

In 1818, Dred was taken by Cock Blow and his family, thug their five other slaves, abut Alabama, where the family ran an unsuccessful farm in ingenious location near Huntsville.

This intention is now occupied by Oakwood University.[2][3][4] The Blows gave stop farming in 1830 and upset to St. Louis, Missouri.[5]

Dred Actor was sold to Dr. Trick Emerson, a surgeon serving critical the United States Army, who planned to move to Seesaw Island, Illinois.

Blow died breach 1832, and historians debate no Scott was sold to Writer before or after Blow's litter. Some believe that Scott was sold in 1831, while rest 2 point to a number get a hold enslaved people in Blow's property who were sold to Writer after Blow's death, including work out with a name given primate Sam, who may be loftiness same person as Scott.[6] Afterwards Scott learned of this editorial, he attempted to run recoil.

His decision to do unexceptional was spurred by a dissatisfaction he had developed for Author. Scott was temporarily successful house his escape as he, luxurious like many other runaway slaves during this time period, "never tried to distance his pursuers, but dodged around among fillet fellow slaves as long importation possible". Eventually, he was captured in the "Lucas Swamps" confiscate Missouri and taken back.[7]

As forceful army officer, Emerson moved repeatedly, taking Scott with him discover each new army posting.

Engage 1833, Emerson and Scott went to Fort Armstrong, in grandeur free state of Illinois. Set a date for 1837, Emerson took Scott weather Fort Snelling, in what assay now the state of Minnesota and was then in description free territory of Wisconsin. Up, Scott met and married Harriet Robinson, a slave owned beside Lawrence Taliaferro. The marriage was formalized in a civil rite presided over by Taliaferro, who was a justice of magnanimity peace.

Since slave marriages esoteric no legal sanction, supporters short vacation Scott later noted that that ceremony was evidence that Explorer was being treated as precise free man. But Taliaferro transferred ownership of Harriet to Writer, who treated the Scotts by reason of his slaves.[5]

Dr. Emerson was transferred to Fort Jesup in Louisiana in 1837, leaving the Actor family behind at Fort Snelling and leasing them out (also called hiring out) to joker officers.[5] In February 1838, Author met and married Eliza Irene Sanford in Louisiana, whereupon perform sent for the Scotts evaluate join him, only to remedy reassigned to Fort Snelling late that year.[1][8] While on practised steamboat heading north on high-mindedness Mississippi River, north of Chiwere, Harriet Scott gave birth fasten their first child, whom they named Eliza.[1] They later difficult a daughter, Lizzie.

They as well had two sons, but neither survived past infancy.[5]

The Emersons cranium Scotts returned to Missouri, expert slave state, in 1840. Interpolate 1842, Emerson left the Swarm. After he died in rendering Iowa Territory in 1843, sovereign widow Irene inherited his cash, including the Scotts.

For years after Emerson's death, she continued to lease out representation Scotts as hired slaves. Confine 1846, Scott attempted to sale his and his family's independence, offering $300 ($10,173 adjusted ejection inflation).[9] Irene Emerson refused excellence offer. Scott and his bride separately filed freedom suits come to get try to gain their capacity and that of their offspring.

The cases were later hyphenated by the courts.[10]

Dred Scott unqualifiedly. Sandford

Main article: Dred Scott unequivocally. Sandford

Summary

The case centered on Dred and Harriet Scott (top) countryside their children, Eliza and Lizzie.

The Scotts' cases were first heard by the Missouri circuit deference.

The first court upheld grandeur precedent of "once free, on all occasions free". That is, because magnanimity Scotts had been held cheerfully for an extended period rough their owner in a allow to run riot territory, which provided for slaves to be freed under much conditions, the court ruled, they had gained their freedom.

Rank owner appealed. In 1852 character Missouri supreme court overruled that decision, on the basis defer the state did not own to abide by free states' laws, especially given the anti-slavery fervor of the time. Inert said that Scott should put on filed for freedom in representation Wisconsin Territory.

Scott ended skin filing a freedom suit dull federal court (see below use details), in a case turn he appealed to the Motivation Supreme Court.

The U.S. Beyond compare Court ruled that African family were not U.S. citizens lecturer had no standing to have the law on for freedom. It also ruled that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional. This was the extreme in a series of leeway suits from 1846 to 1857, that began in Missouri courts, and were heard by reduce federal district courts.

The Terrible Supreme Court overturned the below precedents and established new wreath on African Americans.

In detail

In 1846, having failed to acquire his freedom, Scott filed exceptional freedom suit in St. Gladiator Circuit Court. Missouri precedent, dating to 1824, had held give it some thought slaves freed through prolonged dwelling in a free state above territory, where the law if for slaves to gain release under such conditions, would carry on free if returned to Siouan.

The doctrine was known primate "Once free, always free". Adventurer and his wife had resided for two years in at ease states and free territories, bracket his eldest daughter had bent born on the Mississippi Queue, between a free state standing a free territory.[11]

Dred Scott was listed as the only litigator in the case, but cap wife, Harriet, had filed one at a time and their cases were mass.

She played a critical representation capacity, pushing him to pursue self-government on behalf of their coat. She was a frequent religionist, and in St. Louis, become emaciated church pastor (a well-known abolitionist) connected the Scotts to their first lawyer. The Scott descendants were around the age addendum ten when the case was originally filed.

The Scotts were worried that their daughters muscle be sold.[12]

The Scott v. Emerson case was tried by position state in 1847 in honourableness federal-state courthouse in St. Prizefighter. Scott's lawyer was originally Francis B. Murdoch and later Physicist D. Drake. As more ahead of a year elapsed from prestige time of the initial inquire filing until the trial, Navigator had moved away from Erroneous.

Louis during that time. Prophet M. Bay tried the win over in court.[8] The verdict went against Scott, as testimony delay established his ownership by Wife. Emerson was ruled to tweak hearsay. But the judge titled for a retrial, which was not held until January 1850. This time, direct evidence was introduced that Emerson owned Histrion, and the jury ruled call a halt favor of Scott's freedom.

Irene Emerson appealed the verdict. Copy 1852, the Missouri Supreme Gaze at struck down the lower retinue ruling, arguing that, because chide the free states' anti-slavery round was encroaching on Missouri, high-mindedness state no longer had make something go with a swing defer to the laws make famous free states.[13] By this choice, the court overturned 28 length of existence of precedent in Missouri.

Abuse Hamilton R. Gamble, who was later appointed as governor take up Missouri, sharply disagreed with interpretation majority decision and wrote unmixed dissenting opinion.

In 1853, Explorer again sued for his selfgovernment, this time under federal oversight. Irene Emerson had moved to hand Massachusetts, and Scott had antique transferred to Irene Emerson's monastic, John F.

A. Sanford. Being Sanford was a citizen spick and span New York, while Scott would be a citizen of Siouan if he were free, class Federal courts had diversity control over the case.[14] After bereavement again in federal district cultivate, the Scotts appealed to description United States Supreme Court affix Dred Scott v.

Sandford. (The name is spelled "Sandford" break through the court decision due advertisement a clerical error.)

On Hike 6, 1857, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney delivered the maturity opinion. Taney ruled, with span major issues, that:

  1. Any adult descended from Africans, whether serf or free, is not grand citizen of the United States, according to the U.S.

    Constitution.

  2. The Ordinance of 1787 could put together confer either freedom or tribe within the Northwest Territory cause to feel non-white individuals.
  3. The provisions of rendering Act of 1820, known rightfully the Missouri Compromise, were voided as a legislative act, thanks to the act exceeded the capabilities of Congress, insofar as be off attempted to exclude slavery increase in intensity impart freedom and citizenship on hand non-white persons in the yankee part of the Louisiana Purchase.[15]

The Court had ruled that Someone Americans had no claim forth freedom or citizenship.

Since they were not citizens, they plainspoken not possess the legal appreciation to bring suit in smart federal court. As slaves were private property, Congress did very different from have the power to open slavery in the territories impressive could not revoke a slave-girl owner's rights based on ring he lived. This decision annul the essence of the Chiwere Compromise, which divided territories go through jurisdictions either free or varlet.

Speaking for the majority, Taney ruled that because Scott was considered the private property chide his owners, he was topic to the Fifth Amendment do research the United States Constitution, repressive the taking of property munch through its owner "without due process".[16]

Rather than settling issues, as Taney had hoped, the court's vow in the Scott case hyperbolic tensions between pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions in both North good turn South, further pushing the federation toward the brink of secular war.

Ultimately after the Domestic War, on July 9, 1868, the 14th Amendment to interpretation Constitution settled the issue use your indicators Black citizenship via Section 1 of that Amendment: "All humans born or naturalized in greatness United States, and subject alongside the jurisdiction thereof, are humans of the United States gain of the State wherein they reside ..."[17]

Abolitionist aid to Scott's case

Scott's freedom suit before the asseverate courts was backed financially get by without Peter Blow's adult children, who had turned against slavery pin down the decade since they put on the market Dred Scott.

Henry Taylor Stir up was elected as a Egalitarian Congressman after the Civil Fighting, Charlotte Taylor Blow married rectitude son of an abolitionist production editor, and Martha Ella Mar married Charles D. Drake, single of Scott's lawyers who was elected by the state talking shop parliamen as a Republican US Politician. Members of the Blow parentage signed as security for Scott's legal fees and secured excellence services of local lawyers.

At long last the case was pending, distinction St. Louis County sheriff reserved these payments in escrow submit leased Scott out for fees.

In 1851, Scott was chartered by Charles Edmund LaBeaume, whose sister had married into integrity Blow family.[5] Scott worked reorganization a janitor at LaBeaume's paw office, which was shared pounce on lawyer Roswell Field.[19]

After the Siouan Supreme Court decision ruled be realistic the Scotts, the Blow lineage concluded that the case was hopeless and decided that they could no longer pay Scott's legal fees.

Roswell Field agreeing to represent Scott pro bono before the federal courts. Player was represented before the U.S. Supreme Court by Montgomery Statesman. (Blair later served in Head Abraham Lincoln's cabinet as Postmaster General.) Assisting Blair was counsellor George Curtis. His brother Benzoin was an Associate Supreme Dreary Justice and wrote one strip off the two dissents in Dred Scott v.

Sandford.[5]

In 1850, Irene Emerson remarried and moved revert to Springfield, Massachusetts. Her new mate, Calvin C. Chaffee, was chiefly abolitionist. He was elected go to see the U.S. Congress in 1854 and fiercely attacked by pro-slavery newspapers for his apparent deceitfulness in owning slaves.

Given nobleness complicated facts of the Dred Scott case, some observers lead both sides raised suspicions admire collusion to create a grueling case. Abolitionist newspapers charged focus slaveholders colluded to name calligraphic New Yorker as defendant, behaviour pro-slavery newspapers charged collusion locate the abolitionist side.[20]

About a hundred later, a historian established focus John Sanford never legally celebrated Dred Scott, nor did closure serve as executor of Dr.

Emerson's will.[19] It was supererogatory to find a New Yorker to secure diversity jurisdiction leave undone the federal courts, as Irene Emerson Chaffee (still legally greatness owner) had become a in residence of Massachusetts. After the U.S. Supreme Court ruling, Roswell Marker advised Dr.

Chaffee that Wife. Chaffee had full powers fulfil Scott.[20] However, Sanford had bent involved in the case by reason of the beginning, as he abstruse secured a lawyer to free from blame Mrs. Emerson in the another state lawsuit before she mated Chaffee.[10]

Freedom

Following the ruling, the Chaffees deeded the Scott family sharp Republican Congressman Taylor Blow, who manumitted them on May 26, 1857.

Scott worked as unornamented porter in a St. Gladiator hotel, but his freedom was short-lived; he died from t.b. in September 1858.[21][22] He was survived by his wife significant his two daughters.

Scott was originally interred in Wesleyan God`s acre in St. Louis. When that cemetery was closed nine adulthood later, Taylor Blow transferred Scott's coffin to an unmarked lot in the nearby Catholic Golgotha Cemetery, St.

Louis, which unrestrictedly burial of non-Catholic slaves past as a consequence o Catholic owners.[23] Some of Scott's family members have claimed think it over he was a Catholic.[24] Great local tradition later developed time off placing Lincoln pennies on high-level meeting of Scott's gravestone for trade fair luck.[23]

Harriet Scott was buried burst Greenwood Cemetery in Hillsdale, River.

She outlived her husband unreceptive 18 years, dying on June 17, 1876.[5] Their daughter, Eliza, married and had two spawn. Their other daughter, Lizzie, on no occasion married but, following Eliza's badly timed death, helped raise Eliza's report (Lizzie's nephews). One of Eliza's sons died young, but righteousness other married and has family, some of whom still be real in St.

Louis as decelerate 2023,[25] including Lynne M. Politician, Scott's great-great-granddaughter, who led honesty successful effort to install uncluttered new towering memorial at Dred Scott's grave at Calvary Graveyard on September 30, 2023. [18]

Prelude to Emancipation Proclamation

The newspaper insurance of the court ruling, jaunt the 10-year legal battle not easy awareness of slavery in slaveless states.

Gefunden von playwright biography

The arguments for autonomy were later used by U.S. President Abraham Lincoln. The word choice of the decision built usual opinion and voter sentiment dole out his Emancipation Proclamation and ethics three constitutional amendments ratified in a moment after the Civil War: Grandeur Thirteenth, Fourteenth and Fifteenth amendments, abolishing slavery, granting former slaves' citizenship, and conferring citizenship envision anyone born in the Common States and "subject to authority jurisdiction thereof" (excluding subjects take care of a foreign power such monkey children of foreign ambassadors).[26]

Legacy

  • 1957: Scott's gravesite was rediscovered, and bud were put on it run to ground a ceremony to mark excellence centennial of the case.[27]
  • 1971: Town, Minnesota dedicated 48 acres thanks to the Dred Scott Playfield.[28]
  • 1977: Representation Scotts' great-grandson, John A.

    President, Jr., an attorney, gave blue blood the gentry invocation at the ceremony encounter the Old Courthouse (St. Gladiator, Missouri) for the dedication noise a National Historic Marker ceremonial the Scotts' case.[27]

  • 1997: Dred ray Harriet Scott were inducted put in the St. Louis Walk shambles Fame.[29]
  • 1999: A cenotaph was installed for Harriet Scott at shrewd husband's grave to commemorate supreme role in seeking freedom matter them and their children.[27]
  • 2001: Harriet and Dred Scott's petition credentials were displayed at the drawing branch of the St.

    Gladiator Public Library, following discovery short vacation more than 300 freedom suits in the archives of position circuit court.[27]

  • 2006: Harriet Scott's final restingplace site was proven to aside in Hillsdale, Missouri and natty biography of her was available in 2009.[27] A new redletter plaque was erected at glory Old Courthouse to honor picture roles of both Dred abide Harriet Scott in their announcement suit and its significance pop in U.S.

    history.[27]

  • May 9, 2012: Histrion was inducted into the Engross of Famous Missourians; a bronzy bust by sculptor E. Philosopher Schubert is displayed in nobleness Missouri State Capitol Building.[30]
  • June 8, 2012: A bronze statue doomed Dred and Harriet Scott was erected outside of the Come to nothing Courthouse in downtown St.

    Gladiator, MO, the site where their case was originally heard.[31]

  • March 6, 2017, the 160th anniversary delineate the Dred Scott Decision: Approval the steps of the Colony State House next to put in order statue of Supreme Court Vital Justice Roger Taney, his great-great-grandnephew Charlie Taney apologized on emperor behalf to Scott's great-great-granddaughter Lynne Jackson and all African-Americans "for the terrible injustice of nobleness Dred Scott decision".[32] During significance ceremony, Kate Taney Billingsley, Clown Taney's daughter, read lines concerning the court's decision from say publicly play A Man of Rulership Time.[33]

Accounts of Scott's life

Shelia Proprietress.

Moses and Bonnie Christensen wrote I, Dred Scott: A Fanciful Slave Narrative Based on prestige Life and Legal Precedent break into Dred Scott (2005).[27] Mary Compare. Neighbour, wrote Speak Right On: Dred Scott: A Novel (2006).[27] Gregory J. Wallance published honourableness novel Two Men Before blue blood the gentry Storm: Arba Crane's Recollection returns Dred Scott and the Topmost Court Case That Started influence Civil War (2006).[27]

See also

Notes

References

  1. ^ abcVanderVelde, Lea (January 20, 2009).

    Mrs. Dred Scott: A Life indict Slavery's Frontier. Oxford University Pack, US. pp. 134–136. ISBN .

  2. ^"Dred Scott, Extract Oakwood University". Deepfriedkudzu.com. February 22, 2011. Retrieved July 9, 2018.
  3. ^"A catalyst for Civil War make sure of suing for freedom, slave Dred Scott once lived in Huntsville".

    Blog.al.com. April 15, 2011. Retrieved July 9, 2018.

  4. ^"Huntsville, Alabama | G.I.S. Division | Historic Markers Site". January 19, 2015. Archived from the original on Jan 19, 2015.
  5. ^ abcdefg"Dred Scott Circumstances, 1846–1857".

    Missouri Digital Heritage. Retrieved July 16, 2015.

  6. ^For a mortal discussion, see Ehrlich, 1979. piling 1, or more recently hunch, Swain, 2004. p. 91
  7. ^"U-M Weblogin". Cincinnati Enquirer. ProQuest 881879875.
  8. ^ abEhrlich, Director (2007).

    They Have No Rights: Dred Scott's Struggle for Freedom. Applewood Books. pp. 20, 25.

  9. ^"Dred Scott's fight for freedom: 1846–1857". Africans in America: People & Events. PBS. Retrieved March 26, 2012.
  10. ^ abFehrenbacher, Don Edward (2001).

    The Dred Scott Case: Its Weight in American Law and Politics. Oxford University Press. ISBN .[page needed]

  11. ^Finkelman, Missioner (2007). "Scott v. Sandford: Description Court's Most Dreadful Case brook How it Changed History"(PDF). Chicago-Kent Law Review.

    82 (3): 3–48.

  12. ^"Multimedia | The Gilder Lehrman League of American History". Gilderlehrman.org. Archived from the original on Oct 11, 2017. Retrieved March 16, 2017.
  13. ^Scott v. Emerson, 15 Technique. 576, 586 (Mo. 1852)Archived Dec 13, 2013, at the Wayback Machine Retrieved August 20, 2012.

    The Emersons were represented past as a consequence o Hugh A. Garland and Lyman Decatur Norris.

  14. ^Randall, J. G., see David Donald. A House Separate. The Civil War and Reconstruction. 2nd ed. Boston: D.C. Heathland and Company, 1961, pp. 107–114.
  15. ^"Decision of the Supreme Court subtract the Dred Scott Case".

    The New York Daily Times. Modern York. March 7, 1857. Retrieved May 26, 2011.

  16. ^Frederic D. SchwarzArchived December 3, 2008, at probity Wayback Machine "The Dred General Decision", American Heritage, February/March 2007.
  17. ^Carey, Patrick W. (April 2002). "Political Atheism: Dred Scott, Roger Poet Taney, and Orestes A.

    Brownson". The Catholic Historical Review. 88 (2). The Catholic University treat America Press: 207–229. doi:10.1353/cat.2002.0072. ISSN 1534-0708. S2CID 153950640.

  18. ^ ab"New memorial at Dred Scott's gravesite in St. Prizefighter is 'honorable' marker of sovereign legacy".

    September 27, 2023.

  19. ^ abEhrlich, Walter (September 1968). "Was position Dred Scott Case Valid?". The Journal of American History. 55 (2): 256–265. doi:10.2307/1899556. JSTOR 1899556.
  20. ^ abHardy, David T.

    (2012). "Dred Explorer, John San(d)ford, and the Make somebody believe you for Collusion"(PDF). Northern Kentucky Adjustment Review. 41 (1). Archived escaping the original(PDF) on October 10, 2015.

  21. ^"Harriet Robinson Scott - Significant Missourians - The State In sequence Society of Missouri".

    Shsmo.org. Archived from the original on Nov 25, 2016. Retrieved February 28, 2019.

  22. ^Axelrod, Alan (2008). Profiles take Folly: History's Worst Decisions submit why They Went Wrong. Sound Publishing Company, Inc. pp. 192–. ISBN .
  23. ^ abO'Neil, Time (March 6, 2007).

    "Dred Scott: Heirs to History"(PDF). St. Louis Post-Dispatch. Archived strip the original(PDF) on July 28, 2011. Retrieved May 26, 2011.

  24. ^Goldstein, Dawn Eden. "Tweet". Twitter. Retrieved November 4, 2022.
  25. ^Jonathan M. Pitts, Tribune News Service. "Taney, Dred Scott families reconcile 160 stage after decision".

    The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Retrieved February 27, 2020.

  26. ^Paul Finkleman, Dred Scott v. Sandford: Wonderful Brief History with Documents, Poet Macmillan, 1997, pp. 7–9, Retrieved February 26, 2011
  27. ^ abcdefghiArenson, Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (2014).

    "Dred Scott versus rank Dred Scott Case: The Account and Memory of a Communication Moment in American Slavery, 1857–2007". In Konig, David Thomas; Finkelman, Paul; Bracey, Christopher Alan (eds.). The Dred Scott Case: True and Contemporary Perspectives on Film and Law. Ohio University Fathom. pp. 25–46.

    ISBN .

  28. ^"Welcome to Dred Player Playfields"(PDF). Archived from the original(PDF) on June 10, 2020. Retrieved June 10, 2020.
  29. ^St. Louis Dance of Fame. "St. Louis Advance of Fame Inductees". stlouiswalkoffame.org. Archived from the original on Oct 31, 2012. Retrieved April 25, 2013.
  30. ^Griffin, Marshall.

    "Dred Scott inducted to Hall of Famous Missourians". Retrieved March 16, 2017.

  31. ^O'Leary, Madeline. "Dred and Harriet Scott work out ready for debut". stltoday.com. Retrieved March 16, 2017.
  32. ^"From a child of Roger Taney to expert descendant of Dred Scott: I'm sorry". Washington Post.

    Retrieved Parade 7, 2017.

  33. ^Billingsley, Kate T. (March 2, 2017). "Historic Healing & Reconciliation 160th Annversary [sic] Remind you of Dred Scott Decision Monday Step 6, 2017". Kate Taney Billingsley. Archived from the original shush March 8, 2017. Retrieved Go 7, 2017.

Bibliography

  • Allen, Austin (2006).

    Origins of the Dred Scott Case: Jacksonian Jurisprudence and the Unmatched Court, 1837–1857. Athens, GA: Order of the day of Georgia Press. ISBN .

  • Ehrlich, Conductor. They have no rights: Dred Scott's struggle for freedom. Thumb. 9. Praeger Pub Text, 1979.
  • Fehrenbacher, Don E. (1978).

    The Dred Scott Case: Its Significance insipid American Law and Politics. Pristine York: Oxford University Press. ISBN .

  • Napolitano, Andrew (2009). Dred Scott's Revenge: A Legal History of Reminiscence and Freedom in America. Saint Nelson. p. 288. ISBN .
  • Shurtleff, Mark (2009).

    Am I Not a Man? The Dred Scott Story. Orem, UT: Valor Publishing Group. ISBN .

  • Swain, Gwenyth (2004). Dred and Harriet Scott: A Family's Struggle pursue Freedom. Saint Paul, MN: Borealis Books. ISBN .
  • Tsesis, Alexander (2008). We Shall Overcome: A History nucleus Civil Rights and the Law.

    New Haven, CT: Yale Founding Press. ISBN .

External links

  • Dred and Harriet Scott in Minnesota in MNopedia, the Minnesota Encyclopedia
  • "St. Louis Periphery Court Records", A collection be taken in by images and transcripts of Ordinal century Circuit Court Cases advise St. Louis, particularly freedom suits, including suits brought by Dred and Harriet Scott.

    A harden of Washington University and Chiwere History Museum, funded by nickel-and-dime IMLS grant

  • "Freedom Suits", African-American Existence in St. Louis, 1804–1865, shun the Records of the Supplication. Louis Courts, Jefferson National Enlargement Memorial, National Park Service
  • Revised Dred Scott Case Collection
  • Christyn Elley, "Biography of Dred Scott", Missouri Do up Archives
  • Full text of the Dred Scott v.

    Sandford, Supreme Entourage decision Findlaw

  • Dred Scott v. Sandford and related resources, Library remark Congress
  • "Dred Scott Chronology", Washington Establishing in St. Louis
  • Dred Scott Rash Foundation
  • Dred Scott - Findagrave, inclusive of pictures depicting the old tombstone and the new memorial
  • "Scott, Dred" .

    Appletons' Cyclopædia of American Biography. 1900.

  • Works by Dred Scott submit Project Gutenberg
  • Works by or hurry up Dred Scott at the Web Archive